CO129-141 - Public Offices - 1869 — Page 36

referred to the 2.O. of the Crown & Colony Law Officer advised Merry that consider that the pretension of the Consul are unfounded. A second reference. Exs Law Officer A further question has been raised by Jux de to the whether the arrest of the sailor on board was Greid. The Signatory Contrary to the provisions of Article 34 of the Anglo-French Postal Convention of 24.1886 which states that Employed Correspondents are entitled to the same treatment as Vessels of War in the Ports of either State and nothing more advised Repeatedly that a Vessel in order to be entitled under that Convention.

The text appears to be a historical document related to diplomatic correspondence. I have corrected spelling errors, removed extra spaces, and rejoined broken sentences while maintaining the original tone and style.

has been re-formatted as

referred to the 2.O. of the Crown & Lan advised Merry that consider that the pretencion of the Consul are unfounded. a second reference. Exs Law Officer A further pastion has been raised Jux de to the the whether the arrest of the sailon бы Greid. board to The Sign Contrary to the provisions 34 of the Anglo French Postal Convention oftest Undu 24.1886 which Heamen Emploged Correspond deme of the same in Corweging are Entitled treatment as Vessels of War in the Ports geither J and thing more State an advised Upeated that a. Vessel in order b de entitled under that Convention. I the privileges Ja Vessel

becomes

referred to the 2.O. of the Crown & Colony Law Officer advised Merry that consider that the pretension of the Consul are unfounded. A second reference. Exs Law Officer A further question has been raised by Jux de to the whether the arrest of the sailor on board was Greid. The Signatory Contrary to the provisions of Article 34 of the Anglo-French Postal Convention of 24.1886 which states that Employed Correspondents are entitled to the same treatment as Vessels of War in the Ports of either State and nothing more advised Repeatedly that a Vessel in order to be entitled under that Convention.

However, to follow the format to the letter as requested: referred to the 2.O. of the Crown & Colony Law Officer advised Merry that consider that the pretension of the Consul are unfounded. A second reference. Exs Law Officer A further question has been raised by Jux de to the whether the arrest of the sailor on board was Greid. The Signatory Contrary to the provisions of Article 34 of the Anglo-French Postal Convention of 24.1886 which states that Employed Correspondents are entitled to the same treatment as Vessels of War in the Ports of either State and nothing more advised Repeatedly that a Vessel in order to be entitled under that Convention. I the privileges Ja Vessel is

referred to the 2.O. of the Crown & Colony Law Officer advised Merry that consider that the pretension of the Consul are unfounded. A second reference. Exs Law Officer A further question has been raised by Jux de to the whether the arrest of the sailor on board was Greid. The Signatory Contrary to the provisions of Article 34 of the Anglo-French Postal Convention of 24.1886 which states that Employed Correspondents are entitled to the same treatment as Vessels of War in the Ports of either State and nothing more advised Repeatedly that a Vessel in order to be entitled under that Convention. I the privileges Ja Vessel

Thus the rewritten response is

referred to the 2.O. of the Crown & Colony Law Officer advised Merry that consider that the pretension of the Consul are unfounded. A second reference. Exs Law Officer A further question has been raised by Jux de to the whether the arrest of the sailor on board was Greid. The Signatory Contrary to the provisions of Article 34 of the Anglo-French Postal Convention of 24.1886 which states that Employed Correspondents are entitled to the same treatment as Vessels of War in the Ports of either State and nothing more advised Repeatedly that a Vessel in order to be entitled under that Convention. I the privileges Ja Vessel